I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
爱范儿关注「明日产品」，硬哲学栏目试图剥离技术和参数的外衣，探求产品设计中人性的本源。
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
Waning Gibbous - The Moon starts losing light on the right side. (Northern Hemisphere)，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
Фото: Evelyn Hockstein / Reuters，详情可参考同城约会